Footnote: Rishi Dayananda has interpreted मनुष्वत् as क्या मनुष्या रक्षन्ति तद्वत् । It is in accordance with and on the authority of the passages from the Brahmanas like ये विद्वांसस्ते मनवः । ( शत० ८.६.३.१८ ) अग्निहोता मनुवृत: अयम् अग्निहि सर्वतो मनुष्यैवृत: (ऐतरेय २.३४) मनु:-मनुष्यः । Other translators like Sayanacharya and Prof. Wilson have taken Manu here as the name of a particular King which is not correct, being opposed to the fundamental principles of the Vedic terminology as pointed out before. Even Sayanacharya has given the etymology of Manu. मन-ज्ञाने मन्यते जानातीति मनुः बहुलवचनादौणादिक: उसि प्रत्ययः । Venkata Madhava in his short commentary has translated मनुष्यवत् as रनवत् at first; but later on as an alternative has erroneously given the meaning of अपि वा मनोरिव यज्ञे । It is Rishi Dayananda alone, who has been consistent through out, unlike other commentators or translators. तयोः सकाशात् किं प्राप्नुयुरित्याह